You are here

No effect of basic bladder advice in enuresis: A randomized controlled trial

By M. Cederblad, A. Sarkadi, G. Engvall, and T. Nevéus

Journal of Pediatric Urology, Volume 11, Issue 3, June 2015, Pages 153.e1–153.e5

Editor's comments:
Good science is based on questioning why we do things the way we do. This study investigated the effect of “empathic doctoring advice”, such as daytime voiding and drinking advice for children with nocturnal enuresis. The results of the study confirm what we clinically suspect: daytime voiding and drinking recommendations do not influence the number of wet nights, nor do they improve the success of subsequent alarm therapy.

Abstract


Background

There are two firstline, evidence-based treatments available for nocturnal enuresis: desmopressin and the enuresis alarm. Prior to use of these therapies, international experts usually recommend that the children also be given basic bladder training during the daytime. The rationale behind this recommendation is that daytime bladder training or urotherapy, is a mainstay in the treatment of daytime incontinence caused by detrusor overactivity. Still, there is, as yet, no firm evidence that daytime bladder training is useful against nocturnal enuresis.

Aim

To explore whether basic bladder advice has any effect against nocturnal enuresis. Study design The study was prospective, randomized, and controlled. The evaluated intervention was bladder advice, given in accordance with ICCS guidelines and focused on regular voiding, sound voiding posture, and sufficient fluid intake. Forty children aged 6 years or more with previously untreated enuresis, but no daytime incontinence, were randomized (20 in each group) to receive either first basic bladder advice for 1 month and then alarm therapy (group A) or just the alarm therapy (group B). Based on power calculations, the minimum number of children required in each treatment arm was 15.

Results

The basic bladder advice did not reduce the enuresis frequency in group A (p = 0.089) and the end result after alarm therapy did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.74) (see Table). Only four children in group A had a partial or full response to bladder training, and two of these children relapsed immediately during alarm therapy.

Discussion

This was the first study to evaluate, in a prospective, randomized manner, the value of daytime basic bladder training as a treatment of enuresis. It was found that the treatment neither resulted in a significant reduction in the number of wet nights, nor did it improve the success of subsequent alarm therapy.

Conclusions

The recommendation that all children with enuresis be given bladder training as a firstline therapy can no longer be supported. Instead, we recommend that treatment of these children start with the enuresis alarm or desmopressin without delay. Number of wet nights out of 14 before, during, and after the study. BaselineAfter bladder adviceAfter alarm treatmentGroup A (n = 20)8-14, median 14 (11.9 ± 2.5)0-14, median 13.5 (10.5 ± 4.8)0-14, median 4.5 (5.6 ± 5.36)Group B (n = 20)8-14, median 14 (12.6 ± 2.3)0-14, median 2.5 (4.85 ± 5.38)

Search

Search form

The editorial independence of the resource centre is mandatory and recognized by the EAU and Elsevier.
The journal articles, videos and statements published on the resource centre have been selected independently and without influence from Elsevier, European Urology Editors or the sponsor and do not necessarily reflect their opinions or views.